COVID-19 forced healthcare online almost overnight, and telemedicine proved it could reach patients a hospital never could. But Taliferro sees the gap that solved and the one it didn't: distance stopped being the barrier, and the digital divide took its place.
Published: 5 Jul 2023 · Updated: 4 Sep 2026
Co-Founder Taliferro
Distance has always been one of the biggest barriers to healthcare access — a rural patient without a specialist within a hundred miles, a homebound patient who can't make a drive. COVID-19 forced healthcare online almost overnight, and that solved the distance problem faster than a decade of policy debate had. What it didn't solve is a different, quieter problem: access to the internet connection and device needed to use any of it.
Before telemedicine, distance and thin healthcare infrastructure compounded each other — a rural community with no specialist nearby also tended to have fewer resources to work around that gap. Physical distance wasn't just an inconvenience; it was a structural reason care got delayed or skipped entirely.
When COVID-19 made in-person visits risky, telemedicine, remote monitoring, and virtual consultations went from a slow-moving pilot program to standard practice in a matter of weeks. Providers who had resisted remote care for years suddenly had no choice — and found out most of it worked.
This is where telemedicine delivered on its promise cleanly: a patient in a small town can now consult a specialist without a half-day drive. That shift alone made quality care meaningfully less dependent on zip code — for the patients who had a reliable connection and a device to use it on.
Mobile health apps and online portals gave patients tools for day-to-day self-care and health tracking that used to require a clinic visit — checking symptoms, monitoring a chronic condition, getting basic health education. That shift moves some of the ongoing work of managing health back into a patient's own hands, which matters most for the people who had the least access to a clinic in the first place.
Distance wasn't the only barrier telemedicine helped with — cost was too. A smartphone and a telehealth app are cheaper than a specialist visit plus travel, which opened a narrow but real path toward more inclusive healthcare access for lower-income patients who had a phone and a connection.
This is the piece that gets skipped in most "telehealth revolution" narratives: none of it works without internet access and the comfort to use it. A patient without broadband or a device is exactly as locked out as they were before, just for a different reason. Closing that gap takes real infrastructure investment and digital literacy support — it doesn't close itself just because the technology exists.
Telemedicine, remote monitoring, and mobile health apps genuinely broke down the distance barrier that kept healthcare out of reach for a lot of people during COVID-19. But solving the distance problem revealed the access problem underneath it — a digital divide that determines who actually benefits from any of this. Building a healthcare system that works for everyone means treating internet access and digital literacy as part of the healthcare infrastructure, not an afterthought to it.
Tyrone ShowersStart with workflow execution support, connect it to the execution-first operating model, or tell us what is stuck.
Want this fixed on your site?
Tell us your URL and what feels slow. We’ll point to the first thing to fix.
Explore Taliferro's free tools: Ask TODD · Find · Email Signature Builder · SayIt · Lead Vault · Meet Maya — or become an affiliate.
More from the blog