The board read an article about developers being replaced by AI. Now they want answers that are honest, specific, and safe to act on.
What actually gets faster, what still needs human judgment, and what risks your legal and security teams are not accounting for yet?
Taliferro gives leadership a clear written view of where AI helps, where it hurts, and where review still matters.
AI can speed up repetitive engineering work. It can also make teams overconfident about code that still needs judgment, context, and review.
Security flaws, missing business context, and IP exposure often stay invisible right up until the team starts relying on the output.
AI is strongest at boilerplate, scaffolding, review assistance, and repetitive drafting. It is weakest where the code depends on business nuance, architecture intent, or hidden constraints.
The useful question is not whether AI replaces engineers. It is where AI helps enough to matter and where human review still carries the risk.
You get a written assessment of AI-ready tasks, security and IP risk, and a productivity frame leadership can use without relying on vendor claims.
$999
Book one focused session and get a written view of where AI helps, where it hurts, and where review still matters.
Diagnose the problem in 3 business days. No retainer.
Turn data into predictions and automated decisions.
Fix slow delivery and team coordination without a reorg.
