Most cloud problems aren’t caused by scale. They’re caused by unclear architecture, unmanaged growth, and systems that accrete faster than teams can reason about them. We design cloud architectures that stay understandable as they grow.

Teams don’t fail because they picked the wrong cloud provider. They fail because responsibilities blur, scaling assumptions go unchallenged, and costs are treated as an accounting problem instead of a design constraint.

Cloud architecture consulting is not a report or a slide deck. It’s a focused engagement to make your system easier to understand, safer to change, and cheaper to operate.
You keep control. We bring clarity.
Costs rise without a clear reason because architecture decisions and scaling assumptions were never made explicit.
Changes ripple unpredictably through shared services and tightly coupled components.
Knowledge is siloed, documentation is outdated, and decisions depend on a few key people.
Failures cascade because boundaries and failure domains were never designed intentionally.
Scaling traffic, teams, or data volume makes the system harder—not easier—to operate.
Migrations, re-platforming, or compliance pressure require architectural clarity before execution.
We diagram what actually exists — not what the docs claim.
Clear ownership, clear failure domains, clear costs.
Systems assume components will fail — and recover cleanly.
Cost and performance tuning after structure is correct.
Architectural fixes remove waste permanently.
Clear boundaries reduce coordination overhead.
Incidents become contained, not cascading.
Why architecture decisions show up months later.
Cloud doesn’t fix broken systems.
Architecture drift in practice.
We bring an outside architectural lens. Most teams know how to build in the cloud. The hard part is keeping the system legible as it grows—clear boundaries, predictable failure domains, and cost treated as a design constraint.
Yes. The provider matters, but the architecture matters more. We focus on boundaries, flow, reliability, and cost control—then choose the simplest cloud-native building blocks that fit.
Most waste comes from architecture drift: over-provisioned services, duplicated tooling, runaway data and storage patterns, and unbounded scaling assumptions. We fix the structure first, then optimize the right levers.
A rough spend range, your biggest operational pain, and any upcoming deadlines or scale events. Screenshots and notes are fine. We’ll map what exists and identify what to fix first.
Teams usually see quick wins once boundaries and costs are made explicit. Larger changes depend on risk tolerance, deployment constraints, and how much of the system is shared. We’ll propose a sequence that reduces risk while improving reliability.
Book a short call. We’ll identify where cost, fragility, or confusion is entering the system.
To make the call useful, send whatever you already have. Even partial info helps.
Don’t worry about formatting. Screenshots, notes, or a quick paragraph all work.